This really is an action that is civil pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff The cash advance shop of Wisconsin contends that defendant City of Madison has enacted an ordinance that violates plaintiff’s legal rights to protection that is equal due procedure and it is unconstitutionally obscure. In addition, plaintiff contends that the ordinance is preempted by state legislation.
Whenever plaintiff filed its issue, it desired an initial injunction to avoid defendant from enforcing the presumably unconstitutional ordinance.
Defendant reacted into the movement and presented a movement for summary judgment at the time that is same asserting that the legal maxims determining the motions had been the exact same. Defendant asked that its movement for summary judgment be addressed without enabling plaintiff time for breakthrough, arguing that any development could be unneeded. Continuer la lecture de Cash advance Store of Wisconsin v. City of Madison, 333 F. Supp. 2d 800 (W.D. Wis. 2004)